21 October 2007

Nobel Prize winner, James Watson, sentenced to Ghetto

James Watson, Nobel price winner for his discovery of the double-helix structure of DNA, has been accused of racism to the highest degree. Using the Scientific Method, and his reputation to back him, has scientifically declared that black people should bow to white people.

The London Science Museum's organiser, who cancelled his talk planned for last Friday, said, "Being 79 years old, he's subject to all the illnesses old people get, such as Dementia, Amnesia, and Schizophrenia. We felt it appropriate to discriminate on account of statistics. You never know when he may say things to deliberately arrouse a crowd a people."

The local judge said during his trial, "It would've been a little less targeting to say 'Caucasians may be more intelligent' rather than 'Blacks may be less intelligent.'" By order of the judge, he is to be transported to the middle of the ghetto, released, and will have to find his way out, to see if he is more intelligent than the others.

2 comments:

Doug said...

Watson also asserted there was no reason to believe different races separated by geography should have evolved identically, and he said that while he hoped everyone was equal, "people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true."

Word up.

Chris said...

I agree about the evolution thing, but only as an unproven theory, which is all evolution will ever be. It just makes sense. Why would only physical genes isolate themselves from other geographic regions, and not mental genes. however, that does not imply that the difference is anything more than negligible, especially in today's age where the internet allows people to meet others on opposite sides of the globe, marry, have kids, and have a kid who'se intelligence is exactly between their two parents, re-balancing everything out again. one in ten couples married met on the internet according to statistics.

You can talk to members of any race and find people borderline retarded, then you can go to Harvard and find people of various races studying various things. Let's say his evidence is indisputable, that does not mean it has merit in a world where you really couldn't tell the difference if you actually go out and meet these people. There are plenty of white liberals that according to his definition, should probably be black.